Juniors Alex, Ben, Nina, and Sophie created an informational video about InLab [here]. Enjoy!
Juniors Alex, Ben, Nina, and Sophie created an informational video about InLab [here]. Enjoy!
The Innovation Lab teachers love reading! We will join you in reading the summer reading, and we can’t wait to find out what you think!
All Innovation Lab students will read two books for summer reading – one assigned grade level text listed below and a self-selected text. For your free choice, we recommend choosing from past Greenwich Reads Together books or from a list of age-appropriate, award-winning books. ( Questions? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org)
InLab Freshmen: Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck
InLab 113A Of Mice and Men and Code Girls by Liza Mundy
InLab Sophomores: Code Girls by Liza Mundy (2018 Greenwich Reads Together Selection)
InLab Juniors: Code Girls by Liza Mundy (2018 Greenwich Reads Together Selection)
InLab Seniors: follow the summer reading directions for AP or Shapers or for the wider GHS.
Read widely. Read well. Enjoy!
You must take notes on both books. The notes should help you remember your books so that you can successfully write about and discuss them when school begins. They must be your own notes, not printed information from the Internet.
→ Your notes should include:
Need inspiration? Here are some suggestions…
Check out these possible selection sources:
On the heels of an exciting and professional exhibition at the Bruce Museum in February, InLab students worked hard to prepare their National History Day work for a Parent Showcase on March 15th in the GHS Media Center, and half of the juniors and sophomores elected to compete in the Fairfield County Regional NHD competition on Saturday, March 17th. There were even four seniors who elected to compete independently of their classes!
This year’s theme, Conflict and Compromise in History, afforded students many creative avenues of exploration. Students are allowed to choose the format for presenting their research–documentary, exhibit, website, performance or paper–and we had nearly every style represented.
We are thrilled to share that Innovation Lab swept the group performance category with first, second, and third place honorees! We are equally proud that our students placed first in individual performance, second in group exhibit, and third in individual documentary! All of our students shared their work and participated in a rigorous interview about their scholarship and creative choices. Congratulations to all of our competitors who spent the better part of a Saturday at Sacred Heart University showcasing their work!
“The Real Cost of Nuclear Energy” A documentary by Charles Achoa, Julian Ribushofski, Tyler Rozmus
“The Forgotten Inferno: The UpStairs Lounge 1973” An exhibit by Lucas Brien, Aditya Malhotra, Evan Pey, Isabella Sampedro
“Making W.A.V.E.S in World War II” An exhibit by Alexandra Cid, Ridge Muskus, Jessica Neri, Jessica Toscano
“The NACGN and ANA Merger: Conflict and Compromise” A documentary by Kathryn Papas
“The 38th Parallel in Cold War Korea” An exhibit by Mark Lorenz and James Mair
“Conflict in the Vietnam War, Compromise in Humanity” An exhibit by Iven Zegers and Will Taki
“The Battle Without Guns: The Story of the Miracle on Ice” An exhibit by Max Leite and Preston Bitteker
“The Columbine Shooting: Conflict and Compromise Over Gun Control” An exhibit by Kaija Tschakert
“Did Cold War Technology Help or Hurt the World?” An exhibit by Daniel Thivierge
3rd Place Individual Documentary: “The Space Race: How Conflict on Earth Compromised the Dominion of Space” by Liam Brinton
2nd Place Group Exhibition: “Greenwich Women Face the Great War” by Sophia Fernandez & Sydney Harris
1st Place Group Performance: “Barbara McClintock: Jumping Over Conflict and Creating Compromise to Expand the Knowledge of the Genome” by Flora Dieveich, Sofia Dodaro, Katherine Hurst, Nicole Wood
2nd Place Group Performance: “Society’s Compromise is a Whole New Crime: The Rape of Recy Taylor” by Sophie Anderlind, Jody Bell, Nina Hirai
3rd Place Group Performance: “The Questions We Didn’t Ask, The Stories They Didn’t Tell: How Equality and Identity Were Compromised Under ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ Ari Ceppi & Gracie McCooe
1st Place Individual Performance: “The Pentagon Papers: An Inner Conflict, An External Compromise in American Values” by Emma Olmsted
When you’re a student, the rare day off during the week is glorious and second to only a surprise snow day. The day before feels like a Friday; you get to sleep in and usually you spend most of the day hanging out with your friends or binge-watching Netflix. On Election Day, however, eleven juniors and seniors spent their free day traveling from Greenwich to Boston and back. In the Lyft on the way back to South Station, I asked Jess, Nina, and Sophie if our visit was worth the travel time. Their shouts of “are you kidding?” and “uh, yeah!” were both affirming to me and startling to our driver. So what was worth it?
I am fortunate to know a biomedical engineer named Josiah at Emulate, a company that makes organs-on-a-chip. When I was in Boston visiting last year, Josiah gave me an impromptu tour of Emulate’s space. It was cool – a large, open office with a lab running parallel in an innovation park along the seaport. Josiah and a team of colleagues agreed to host a visit from eleven of our juniors and seniors interested in biomedical engineering. The team gave an engaging presentation about their company and their technology. We met two of the five dogs on staff. The CTO even stopped in for a quick pep talk. And then?
We put on gowns, hairnets, gloves, and booties and entered a pressurized air chamber to blast away any dust we might still have on us. The scientists and engineers showed us the chips and let us practice injecting dye into them. They showed students what experiments they were running, how they interpreted the results, and took questions about the process. In addition to high-level questions about the company’s technology, students also asked about what colleges the employees went to, their internships, and what they needed to do to work at a company like Emulate. Students learned as much from these conversations as they did from the visit.
Perhaps the most powerful part of the visit happened at the end. We de-gowned and headed into the company’s flex space – students know a Design Studio when they see one – and the seniors pitched their science project ideas to the scientists and engineers. All of the employees gave their input on each pitch. They also made it clear that they want to hear back from our students later in the year and would be happy to be available for questions along the way. This is both generous and a unique opportunity for the five seniors who were there.
And for the juniors? Grahame said his favorite part of the trip was “talking to engineers who had already graduated college and working in careers what I want to.” Nina? “Wearing the suits! But also, actually going into the lab and experiencing what they experience on a daily basis.” Jess said “it’s the whole interactive experience that I enjoyed. It was unexpected, but really cool to see inside.”
Before we visited the lab, Ben and I took the students to Brattle Book Shop, a used book store a block or so from the Boston Common. I thought it would be a quick stop on the way to lunch, but we ended up running late because our students spent an hour browsing.
Grahame bought a handful of books about the American Revolution. Adi and Sophie were in awe of the rare book section upstairs. Rich loved how small some of them were. I bought cookbooks. On the train home, we compared our haul and talked about the trip. Ben even struck up a cafe-car conversation with a professor at Brown wearing a Star Trek t-shirt. He listened to our description of the lab and offered contact information for our senior research students. Sofia and Flora wrote him letters last week.
Thank you to Emulate for providing photos of our visit:
A week and a half ago, the sophomore STEM class was knee-deep in data collection. Literally. We were all standing in the middle of the Mianus river looking for invertebrates to help measure the health of the Mianus River watershed area. The students had this opportunity to work with the Greenwich Audubon Society and contribute to the data records that the Audubon has been tracking over the years. This past week they have been working full tilt on a series of environmental issues projects where they are tracking small scale models of major global issues. Oceanic Garbage Patches, global climate change with polar ice melting, oil spills, and eutrophication to name a few.
Their math content has been focused on statistical analysis of data set and determining trends in the patterns of data using the mathematical functions the patterns look like. The students are in the midst of collecting the data to interpret those trends and come up with their interpretations of that data. The project set up has been challenging as students and their teachers have been scrambling to find the materials to put everything together. We have plastics sitting in sea water, algae blooming in a pond water tank, oils spills in several containers, planter boxes and pots with fertilizers and plants set up to measure water runoff, and a sealed chamber with carbon dioxide periodically pumped in to measure ice melt rates. We are using a variety of probes that can measure several different ion concentrations in different substances, dissolved oxygen, soil moisture, atmospheric oxygen and carbon dioxide, pH, turbidity and even this temperature thing. The students have been evaluating this data in several setups and looking at their impacts. Hopefully they can draw some good conclusions, suggest further areas of research, or maybe even hint at solutions. Who knows? Its just exciting to see them working so hard on these ideas, and I am looking forward to them to be able to present their results to not only their junior peers who conducted similar research the year before, but also get feedback from professionals, that can help to direct them to refine their projects. I’m just hoping the ocean acidification project doesn’t accidentally delete the data from their seven day long test. I’m pretty sure they learned their lesson after a three day control test data set went missing. Fingers crossed!
“You joined InLab? How is that?”
This is what I hear from students, teachers, and members of the community when I mention my new role in Innovation Lab. “Do you like it?” “What makes it any different from the other classes you teach?” “What are you actually doing down there?” So, for my first blog post, I thought it might be useful to reflect on my short experience as a new teacher in Innovation Lab.
Officially I’m here to be a Humanities teacher, or perhaps facilitator is a better term. I’m partnered with Mike Belanger, and together we lead a double block that aims to pull our English and history content together through long-term, high stakes projects. To execute the projects well, the students must acquire, synthesize and apply their understanding of skills and content. We can differentiate with students to make their knowledge acquisition process most appropriate for their level of interest and ability. We can provide individualized support as they synthesize and evaluate what they have found. And we can question them appropriately to help them apply and express their understanding.
But what I’m really doing is learning, and it’s difficult. I am struggling to learn to let go and let the students make mistakes. Basically, for now, I fail in letting them fail. Intellectually I know that we learn from failure. Most would agree with the prevailing pedagogies that tell us that letting students fail is good practice. They’ll develop grit, they’ll get real-world experience. But how often do we feel that we have the time to let failure happen? What does it feel like to fail during an observation, or when you have a summative assessment coming up? To me, failure has always felt like a great concept, but not a realistic option in my classroom. Now, in InLab, I’m learning through my students, my colleagues and my own missteps that it is possible. InLab provides us with the space, the flexibility, and the mindset, to fail and to fail well. I’m not comfortable with it, yet, but I’m learning quickly!
And that’s the thing. I’m learning as much as my students are. This is a new kind of learning curve. It’s not just the content; I have to make a serious shift in my habits and teaching methods. One of the best things about this situation is that because how we learn is such an integral and transparent part of the InLab philosophy, my students are one of my greatest resources. One student gets distracted from her work by articles about 21st-century learning, and another is willing to brainstorm new grading systems. We collaborate to find the best ways to learn.
Early in the year, our class went to Greenwich Avenue to interview experts on local issues. We had some incredible successes that day. Students interviewed the head of the Conservation Commission, the First Selectman, a local attorney, and a small business owner. We also had some groups who left empty-handed. In the end, they all understood why their days had worked, or not worked, for them. With this knowledge, they enter the interview portion of their current documentary project better prepared.
As we head towards the end of our first quarter, our tenth graders are in production mode on short documentary films that use their understanding of the Progressive Era, social issues, argumentation, storytelling, and persuasion to identify, research, and identify solutions for modern local issues. There are hours of conferencing and guidance, and hours of letting go. In a week they’ll be editing, and soon after they’ll screen their rough cuts in class. It’s hard to say what the results will be. I expect some will be successful, and others will not. But I know that the students will take what they learn from this experience, and apply it to the next project. I know that they will be able to assess their growth and learning, and that they’ll be able to set goals for their next project.
So, to answer your questions: How is InLab? It’s difficult, it’s engaging, it’s different, and it’s the same. Do you like it? I love it. What makes it any different from the other classes you teach? I have more flexibility, more permission to explore and make mistakes, and more time with each of my students. I’m in front of the room less, but at the table with students much more. I don’t have more time or less work but my practices have changed. What are you actually doing down there? Much of what my creative fellow teachers already do outside of InLab, but with the environment that allows us to take it even further. We encourage our students to drive their own learning, to express their learning in complex and meaningful ways, to focus on growth, and to find success in failure.
Over the last two weeks, we asked students to experiment with a different type of blog format when writing about their air launchers from STEM class. Nina and Alex chose to vlog about it and we were blown away when we saw it this morning. Please enjoy!
What better way to study projectile motion in STEM 11 than to launch projectiles? It makes so much sense; in Physics, the first semester is devoted to the study of displacement, velocity, acceleration, forces, momentum, and impulse. In Precalculus, we cover vectors, parametric equations, vertical motion, and a million textbook force problems that have diagrams about Physics. We decided to hinge the first quarter on the mission to make a t-shirt cannon that students would launch at school events. Getting to the math and Physics is easy, but what about making a safe air cannon?
Success, right? T-shirt launched! Well, when we began researching the pressure ratings for PVC air chambers, we found that OSHA’s stance is pretty clear: do not use it for compressed air, ever, at any pressure. All pressure ratings on PVC are for liquids like water, not compressible fluids like air. These people on YouTube operate under the assumption that everything will probably be fine since everyone else does it that way. But there are plenty of stories online about PVC exploding and causing serious injury. We did not want to put ourselves or our students in any danger. So how could we still do the project, but do it safely?
It’s not the cheapest way to launch a tennis ball, but it’s the safest (we are thankful to the Greenwich Alliance for Education for making this R&D possible). This is the same stuff used for gas lines in homes and buildings. It’s rated to 48,000 PSI. The weakest point in the air chamber is the valve stem, which will leak around 140 PSI. The bike pump and air compressor we’re using to fill the chambers hits its max at 130 PSI. After the air is released, it pushes the ball through the PVC, which is perfectly safe to carry the projectile.
Fall 2017: Students’ first launch
Today, students will launch their small air-powered launchers for the first time. They will use the projectile motion equations seen in every Precalculus and Physics course:We generated these equations during the first two weeks using student-gathered data from a video-recorded drop test.
Now, students will calculate how fast their air launcher can shoot a projectile using the same equation they generated before. We’ll look for relationships between pressure, velocity, distance, and eventually, angle of launch. But for now? Images from class today!
We are excited to share that we have expanded our physical space and our teaching staff! InLab has two new Cantor rooms, 516 and 520, a rehabilitated outdoor courtyard, and five additional faculty members.
Joining the 10th grade team of Michael Belanger (History/Design Studio) and Dana Schlosser (Chemistry/Design Studio) are Jessica von Brachel (English/Design Studio) and Lauren Moskovitz (Math).
Joining the 11th grade team of Christina Shaw (History/Program Associate), Courtney Hawes (English/Design Studio), and Brian Walach (Math/Design Studio) is Ben Gawle (Physics).
Founding teachers of the 12th grade team of Ric Felten (Science Research) and Joe Baske (Social Science Research) are supported by Design Studio 12 teachers, Courtney Hawes and Mike Belanger.
Learn more about our new teachers below!
Jessica von Brachel English 10 Humanities
Before I found my way into the best job I’ve ever held, I worked in a variety of fields in which the power of language and storytelling drove my work. What I lacked was a sense of community. Recognizing what I enjoyed doing and what I wanted to add to it led me, finally, to teaching high school English. Here at GHS I’ve had the opportunity to teach ninth grade English, Short Fiction, Film as Literature, and AP Language and Composition. It has been the most challenging and fulfilling work of my life. I am thrilled to be joining Innovation Lab as a partner with Mr. Belanger in Humanities. I look forward to sharing my love of language, storytelling, and community with the sophomore class and to hearing what it is that drives and excites them. I look forward to finding meaning in our learning and to sharing our discoveries with the world outside of the classroom.
Lauren Moskovitz Math 10 STEM
I am super excited to join the Innovation Lab Team this coming 2017 – 18 school year. I have been teaching mathematics at GHS for 14 years. Over these years, I have been a part of several houses working with a diverse and talented team of teachers. I have always strongly believed, from the very beginning days of my teaching career, that math and science shouldn’t be taught in isolation. Without math how would we communicate the wonders of science? Without science how would we continue to push the limits of mathematics? STEM education connects our students’ worlds to their learning, which ultimately fosters deeper understandings. This strong connection breeds ingenuity. I am inspired to have this tremendous opportunity to collaborate with the Innovation Lab Team to bring science and math alive to my students.
Ben Gawle Physics 11 STEM
When I graduated from Greenwich High School in 2005 I would not have believed I’d be returning to teach physics within the next decade (and neither would my physics teachers). I graduated from UConn with a degree in civil engineering, and after earning my certification, I went on to work at a small structural and forensic engineering firm in the city. Though climbing skyscrapers was fun, my real passion has always been for teaching and learning about science! I come from a family of mostly Connecticut teachers, so I guess you could say it’s in my blood.
While working at schools in New Canaan, I earned a Masters in physics education, and eventually returned home to Greenwich High School in 2016. It has been (and will continue to be) a great pleasure working with the team of professionals in the GHS Science Department, but I am also tremendously glad for this opportunity to branch out to the Innovation Lab next year! I look forward to exploring new ideas and inventing new ways to communicate my passion for science to InLab students this year and hopefully for many years to come.
Joseph Baske Social Science Research 12
I’m so excited to have the opportunity to help guide the InLab seniors in their social science research class this coming year. In my 20+ years at GHS, I’ve taught everything from AP Euro and US history to Economics to ESL freshmen but always with an emphasis on project-based learning. I believe if my students leave with more questions than answers, I’ve done my job.
Outside the classroom, I passionately play and follow basketball, read history, and love to learn with my wonderful family who are all in the Greenwich schools.
I look forward to teaching and learning with InLab for many years to come.
Ric Felten Science Research 12
I have a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from SUNY at Buffalo and a master’s degree in chemistry from Saint Joseph College. After ten years as a senior methods development industrial chemist, I founded a laboratory specializing in scanning electron microscopy as well as x-ray and infrared spectroscopy. I have taught chemistry and physics for the past ten years, and I am looking forward to the opportunity to apply my past experiences to the senior research being performed in the Innovation Lab.
This gallery contains 3 photos.
Originally posted on Jessica Neri :
On May 31 during Humanities class I had my oral Presentation of Learning. I talked about my Sophomore year and the times where I was successful, and areas where I could improve. The Greenwich Public School system…